Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy A7
Dual SIMSM-A700YD
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 3.00 x 0.25 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and White | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 360.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7, getting a global score of 77.8 against 75.4. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A7 has Android 4.4.4 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is extremely newer and noticeably thinner than Samsung Galaxy A7's, but it is also notably heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7, because it has a way bigger display, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a little greater display pixel density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A7 features a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A7 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an additional GPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy A7, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A7. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A7, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.