Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. The Google Pixel 2 is a a lot lighter phone than Galaxy A70, but both of them are equally thin. Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a larger sensor.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.