Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having an 82.7 score against 76.9. The LG G8X ThinQ is an a bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The LG G8X ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A70. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. LG G8X ThinQ features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A70 has a little better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.