Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. These devices work with the same Android 10 operating system. The Galaxy A70 is an older phone than the LG Stylo 6, but it is lighter and just a little thinner anyway. LG Stylo 6 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG Stylo 6 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a just a bit greater display density. LG Stylo 6 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 6 features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video and a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition.
The Galaxy A70 has just a bit better battery life than LG Stylo 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.