Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Moto G Power has Android 11. Even though the Galaxy A70 is older than Moto G Power, it's body is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto G Power and Samsung Galaxy A70 have incredibly similar displays, because although the Moto G Power has a quite lower 1080 x 2300px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have a 0.36 inches camera sensor, the same (4K) video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates. Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G Power has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Power, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.