Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Polar night |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8.3 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, having an 80.5 score against 76.9. Nokia 8.3 5G's design is newer than Galaxy A70's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8.3 5G has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy A70 one, because although the Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Nokia 8.3 5G features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nokia 8.3 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a larger sensor. Nokia 8.3 5G features as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy A70, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Nokia 8.3 5G's battery life is just as good as the Galaxy A70 one.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.