Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is much better than Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Although Galaxy M51 is newer than Galaxy A70, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones in this review use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Galaxy A70 and Galaxy M51 count with extremely similar displays, and although the Galaxy M51 has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy M51 and Galaxy A70 both have very similar storage capacity for games and applications, they have the same internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy M51 takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.