Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a score of 94.8 against 76.9. The Galaxy S20 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is lighter. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing some extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Galaxy S20 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video quality. Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A70 has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy S20 costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.