Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Galaxy A70, but it is much heavier.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208px resolution and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery performance is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A70's battery life. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and better video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A70, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.