Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A70, with a score of 78.3 against 76.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X70 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. The vivo X70 Pro body has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it's a little bit heavier.
The vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel number in each display inch.
Vivo X70 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality pictures and higher 60 fps video frame rates. Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit more storage to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a battery performance that's very similar to Galaxy A70's battery performance, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.