Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier phone.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per display inch. The Galaxy A70 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A70. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.