Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 77.2 against 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro design is just a little thicker but just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A70, and they were released only 5 months apart. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.