Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than the LG K62's overall score of 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a little bit heavier phone than LG K62, but both of them are equally thin. These devices work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a sharper screen than LG K62, because it has a higher display density, a bit bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The LG K62 counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K62 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot higher video definition, a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better battery duration than LG K62, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.