Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a score of 92.9 against 87.1. Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it is a bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. They have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, a greater pixels count in each inch of display and a display of the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra have extremely similar batteries duration. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.