Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a global score of 92.9 against 78.3. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, it must be noted that it is also older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker.
Vivo X70 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's screen, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better storage for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a slightly better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in low light environments, a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Vivo X70 Pro's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's battery performance, although the vivo X70 Pro has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.