Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is slightly better than the Apple iPhone XS Max, having a 91.8 score against 84.5. The Galaxy A71 5G design is newer and somewhat lighter than the Apple iPhone XS Max's, although it is also just a little thicker. IPhone XS Max counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS Max counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688px. Galaxy A71 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a superior battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 42% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.