Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a overall score of 91.8 against 80.3. Galaxy A71 5G's body is extremely newer, but just a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy A71 5G has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh. Galaxy A71 5G has a way better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a way larger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.