Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G body is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot more megapixels back camera and a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.