Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than LG V30's overall score of 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a notably newer cellphone than LG V30, but it is heavier and just a bit thicker. LG V30 features a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy A71 5G one, and although the LG V30 has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG V30 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery performance than LG V30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs more than LG V30, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.