Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a global score of 91.8 against 83.7. The Galaxy A71 5G design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but a little heavier than LG V50 ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.