Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 91.8 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it's just a little heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger camera aperture, faster 30 fps video frame rate and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.