Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. Even though Galaxy A71 5G is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, it must be noted that it is also a incredibly older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a just a bit higher pixels density and a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G has a better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.