Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than the Moto Z4's general score of 79.8. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is newer than the Moto Z4's, but it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better memory for apps and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.