Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 global score. Galaxy A71 5G's body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, even though it was released about 9 months before. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery duration is just as good as Galaxy A71 5G's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.