Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having a 91.8 score against 81. The Galaxy A71 5G is a a lot newer and just a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's somewhat thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bigger screen and a quite higher screen pixels density. Galaxy A71 5G has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations, a much higher video definition and a way better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.