Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, with a score of 91.8 against 87.1. Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer, a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note9. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A71 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy A71 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.