Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ3's overall score of 79.6. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is newer, somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Sony Xperia XZ3. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xperia XZ3 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xperia XZ3 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much larger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.