Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 91.8 against 77.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy A71 5G's construction is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released 4 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a larger display and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.