Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A71 5G's design is older, a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than vivo X60 Pro. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.