Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a score of 91.8 against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G body is newer and just a little thinner, but a little heavier than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 744 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G features a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.