Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy A71's construction is just a little lighter and a little thinner than vivo X70 Pro, even though it was released a little bit more than a year before. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give you identical OS features.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2376, it also counts with a bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit more storage to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy A71 features a little bit better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Vivo X70 Pro's battery duration is very similar to Galaxy A71's battery duration, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.