Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, having a global score of 81.3 against 80.5. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Galaxy A73 5G has a little bit better memory for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A73 5G features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery size. The Galaxy A73 5G has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images in low light situations, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.