Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A8 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's design is notably newer and a little lighter, but also just a little thicker than the Galaxy A8 (2016). Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has older 12 version and Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy A8 (2016) has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a little bigger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a way higher video resolution and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.