Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is just a bit better than Galaxy A8 (2018), having an 81.1 score against 79.2. The Motorola razr (2022) body is much newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than the Galaxy A8 (2018). Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2022) has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A8 (2018) has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.