Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-01-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 score. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is noticeably newer than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it's notably heavier and noticeably thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A8 (2018) takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A8 (2018) also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.