Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 (2018) has a score of 79.2, which is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Galaxy A8 (2018) is an a lot older and a bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit lighter anyway. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count in each inch of display. Vivo X70 Pro features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much higher (4K) video quality and a lot higher 50 MP resolution back camera. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.