Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a global score of 82.1, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star is a way older and noticeably thicker device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has the newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a much better video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.