Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 Star has a general score of 82.1, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A8 Star has a newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, giving you a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A8 Star is a just a little heavier cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but both of them are equally thin.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
The vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, higher video frame rate and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.