Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 global score. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a heavier and thicker cellphone. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a much tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.