Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus, with an 84.9 score against 79.7. Even being the best device in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also an older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A80 one, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little worse 1080 x 2300 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A80 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates, the same sensor size and the same resolution camera, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.