Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-05-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A32's overall score of 84.7. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, the Galaxy A80 design is older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier than the Galaxy A32. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A80 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has more RAM.
Galaxy A32 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a back camera with a 48 MP resolution and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features superior battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.