Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy A80 design is older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Vivo X60 Pro has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 14% greater battery size. Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same sensor size and the same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.