Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a global score of 78.3 against 74.9. The vivo X70 Pro design is newer and a little lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it is a little bit thicker. The vivo X70 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.