Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), getting a global score of 92.8 against 85.2. Even though the iPhone 12 Pro is a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), it's just a little thinner and also newer. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 35% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.