Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 has an overall score of 91.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 score. Apple iPhone 13 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also a little thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy A9 (2018). The Apple iPhone 13 has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a bit greater display density. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 13, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.