Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), getting a general score of 93.3 against 85.2. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). IPhone 13 Pro features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 13 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 24 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A9 (2018) has superior battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.