Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, although it is much heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a quite greater pixel density.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh. The Galaxy A9 (2018) captures clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a lot better 24 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.