Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Mirror black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is just a bit better than LG Q70, with an 85.2 score against 77.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than the LG Q70, it's design is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. LG Q70 counts with a screen that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) one, although the LG Q70 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2310 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher display density and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Q70 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a 0.36 inches sensor, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot higher 32 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Q70 counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.