Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), having an 89.6 score against 85.2. The Motorola edge is a newer phone than Galaxy A9 (2018), although it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola edge features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola edge and Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) feature extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola edge has a just a bit inferior pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bigger display. Motorola edge has a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola edge has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola edge also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola edge has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.