Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), getting an 87.1 score against 85.2. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body is newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a display that is just as good as Galaxy A9 (2018)'s display, although the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a little larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little higher display density.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games as Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), they have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a greater camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back camera and higher 120 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.